ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT OF GREEN ECOLOGICAL
AGRICULTURE IN THE NORTHEAST OF MY
COUNTRY UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT OF
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS E-COMMERCE
Zhiyuan Zhang*
Basic Course Teaching Department, Ningbo City Vocational Technology College,
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315100, China.
zzyarticle@163.com
Reception: 13/02/2023 Acceptance: 08/04/2023 Publication: 28/06/2023
Suggested citation:
Zhang, Z. (2023). Analysis of digital information management of green
ecological agriculture in the Northeast of my country under the
environment of Agricultural products e-commerce. 3C Empresa.
Investigación y pensamiento crítico, 12(2), 92-107. https://doi.org/
10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
92
ABSTRACT
With the rapid development of China's regional agriculture, its consumption of energy,
the squeezing and encroachment of the environment and the pollution of the
ecological environment have been put on the agenda, which stems from the
unreasonable management and regulation of the rapidly developing agricultural
infrastructure. Aiming at the evaluation index cluster of agricultural management in
Northeast China, the main structure of the digital information management platform of
green ecological agriculture we built is divided into the variable layer, middle layer and
evaluation index layer, which is a superimposed and progressive layer structure
design. The results show that compared with 2018, the use index of electronic
agricultural products, per capita greening index, soil organic matter content index and
per capita water content index increased by 30.34%, 6.14%, 25.34% and 30.26%
respectively in 2019. The index of per capita desert land area decreased by 10.97%.
The Sustainability Index experienced an unusual decrease in 2017-2018, with a drop
of 0.08. Compared with 2018, the green ecological index from 2019 to 2021 increased
by 5.94%, 8.58% and 12.87% respectively. This guides the structure and design of
China's future agricultural development.
KEYWORDS
Agricultural ecology, green environmental protection, sustainable development,
information management, data platform
INDEX
ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. CONSTRUCTION OF AN INFORMATION DIGITAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
2.1. Java languages introduction
2.2. Framework construction principle
2.3. MysQL database
3. MODEL VALIDATION
4. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
4.1. Influence of variable layer parameters of digital information management
platform
4.2. Sustainable development assessment of green ecological agriculture
4.3. Green ecological assessment of green ecological agriculture
5. DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
93
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
1. INTRODUCTION
The development of green ecological agriculture can protect and improve the
ecological environment, prevent pollution, maintain ecological balance [1, 2], improve
the safety of agricultural products [3], take the road of sustainable ecological
development [4], and closely integrate environmental construction with economic
development. Combined [5, 6], it can improve the income of agricultural workers while
developing agriculture. Green ecological agriculture, in simple terms, is to use the
principles of ecology, ecological economics and systematic scientific methods to
organically combine the achievements of modern science and technology with the
essence of traditional agricultural technology [7, 8], and integrate agricultural
production, rural economic development and ecological. It is a new comprehensive
agricultural system with ecological rationality and a virtuous cycle of functions that
integrates environmental governance and protection, resource cultivation and efficient
utilization [9, 10]. There are three main models of green ecological agriculture, mainly
including space-time structure type, food chain type and space-time food chain
comprehensive type, as shown in Table 1. Ecological agriculture is an agroecological
economic complex system. According to the principle of "whole, coordinated
circulation and regeneration", the agricultural ecological system and the agricultural
economic system are comprehensively integrated to realize the multi-level utilization
of natural resources and energy, to achieve the maximum ecological economy overall
benefit [11, 12]. At the same time, it can integrate agriculture, forestry, animal
husbandry, sideline and fishery industries[13, 14] to form a comprehensive
development model of large-scale agricultural production, processing and sales,
adapting to the development of the socialist market economy[15]. However, with the
rapid rise of China's e-commerce and the rapid development of informatization, the
application of various digital high-tech information technology and the analysis and
management of modern green ecological agriculture are the inevitable trends in the
development of agricultural modernization.
Table 1. Main modes of green ecological agriculture
Green ecological agriculture is an inevitable way to realize modern agriculture and
efficient and reasonable organization and management are the foundation and
guarantee for the development of ecological agriculture. Scientific management
concepts, tools and methods are the basic means to achieve green agriculture [16,
17]. Green ecological management reflects the choice of ecological agriculture
development model and the innovation of green technology management. Select and
manage agricultural production models from the perspective of agricultural product
agricultural model Features
space-time structure
According to the biological, ecological characteristics and a
rationally formed ecosystem of mutually beneficial symbiotic
food chain
A virtuous cycle agro-ecosystem designed according to the
energy flow and material cycle laws of the agro-ecosystem
Integrated spatiotemporal
food chain
The organic combination of space-time structure type and food
chain type is a mode type with moderate input, high output, less
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
94
production and ecological economics, and research can best reflect ecological
benefits and economy. Nowadays, in the field of analysis and management of green
ecological agriculture, many experts and scholars have made a lot of discussions. For
example, for agriculture and ecological management under uncertain conditions,
Chen, J [18] proposed a reliability-based interval multi-objective crop area planning
model. The integration, developed considering the economic and ecological benefits
of the research system [19, 20], was developed to deal with interval and ambiguous
uncertainties. It focuses on crop area optimization, and the interval objective function
is to maximize system benefits, maximize watershed area, and maximize system
benefits per unit area. Rural agroecosystems have an important impact on the
development of China's economy, society and ecological environment at any time.
Chen, F [21] took big data as the research background and based on the complex
system theory to construct an indicator system for the ecological management system
of rural agroecosystems. The fertilizer was used in the experiment, and the
consumption, water pollution degree, pest and disease degree, carbon and nitrogen
absorption and agricultural economic benefit of the rural agricultural ecosystem in a
certain area were taken as the systematic indicators of the ecological management
system. Using data mining technology in big data [22, 23], collecting and processing
relevant data in the network, analyzing and understanding agricultural ecosystems
through complex systems, and finally calculating and analyzing data of various
indicators, their research shows that agro-ecological management Institutions have a
positive effect on rural agro-ecosystems. In the development of green ecological
agriculture, the optimal water distribution model is an effective tool to provide a
reasonable water distribution scheme [24], Pan, Q. [25] proposed an interval multi-
objective fuzzy interval credible constraint nonlinear programming model, combined
with the estimation of ecological vegetation space water demand, to solve the problem
of agricultural and ecological water allocation in irrigated areas under uncertain
conditions. Excessive fertilization can cause land pollution [26, 27], which is not
conducive to the development of ecological agriculture. Li, X. [28] established a linear
regression equation to predict the runoff in the study area, and then determine the
pollution in the area. Zhu, Z. [29] built a 5G IoT-based agricultural product circulation
information system to realize real-time positioning, information sharing and security
assurance of supply chain circulation. Liu, X. [30]'s research shows that in agricultural
product e-commerce, product quality, brand image, e-commerce platform and logistics
distribution have a significant positive impact on customer satisfaction, and have an
important impact on the sales of agricultural products. Based on the research of many
scholars, we found that in e-commerce, the quality and safety of agricultural products
are decisive factors for the sales of products. Through digital information
management, we can achieve coordinated development and the environment, and
form two virtuous circles in ecology and economy, the unity of the three major benefits
of economy, ecology and society. By studying the data in the development of green
ecological agriculture, and constructing a green ecological management system
model by analyzing these data, data mining, etc., the economic benefits of ecological
agriculture can be improved.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
95
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
The research on green ecological agriculture management is of great significance
to the development of ecological agriculture and the solution to various drawbacks
and crises brought by modern agriculture. However, in the current e-commerce sales,
the safety and quality of agricultural products cannot be presented to customers.
Based on this, in our research, we build an information-based digital management
platform, which includes developed languages, frameworks and databases. In the
digital information management platform, we track and monitor the agricultural product
information of green ecological agriculture in Northeast China throughout the whole
process, to ensure the safety and quality of the agricultural products during the sale of
the agricultural products on the e-commerce platform. In addition, we also discussed
the economic benefits of this digital information platform for green ecological
agriculture.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF AN INFORMATION DIGITAL
MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
To better understand the situation of green ecological agriculture in Northeast
China, this chapter mainly introduces the development languages, development
frameworks and tools used in the electronic platform of agricultural products, and
gives a brief introduction to them according to the situation of green ecological
agriculture in Northeast China. The advantages and reasons for selection are
analyzed one by one. These theories or tools include: languages, frameworks and
databases.
2.1. JAVA LANGUAGES INTRODUCTION
1. There are not many Java language features, and there is no need to consider
issues such as multiple inheritance, operator overloading, automatic forced
conversion, etc.;
2.
Abstract the real green ecological agriculture by Java in Northeast China
through classes, represent agricultural products through objects, and extract
common attributes and behaviors between things through inheritance;
3.
Java can detect type errors in time in the process of compiling the electronic
platform for agricultural products, and can automatically recycle garbage so
that the memory of the electronic platform for agricultural products does not
occupy much space;
4.
Java can perform language conversion in the virtual machines corresponding
to different agricultural product electronic platforms, and parse and run on
different agricultural product electronic platforms;
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
96
5. Java can support the multi-threaded agricultural product electronic platform
model to ensure the synchronization between the agricultural product
electronic platform threads.
This system uses Java7 to develop the electronic platform for green ecological
agricultural agricultural products in Northeast China. As of Java7, the information
features of the electronic platform for agricultural products have been reflected,
annotated, generic, and concurrency.
2.2. FRAMEWORK CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLE
The framework in the agricultural product electronic platform adopts a
layered structure, which consists of five well-designed electronic framework
sub-modules, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The Framework of the Agricultural Products Electronic Platform
Any module in the agricultural product electronic platform can be used
independently, and can also be used in parallel with some modules of other
agricultural product electronic platforms. The five electron spring framework
submodules are as follows:
1. Bean container. The Bean container is the basis for the electronic Spring
framework to realize the IOC layered structure. By reading the XML file or by
parsing the language of the agricultural product electronic platform, it
generates the agricultural product electronic platform information of green
ecological agriculture in Northeast China defined by Bean, and fills it into the
core in a container;
J.U.C.
Spr ing
Spr ing
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
97
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
2. Spring AOP module. This module extracts the agricultural product information
from the aspects of the business process of the agricultural product electronic
platform and encapsulates those behaviors that are not related to the business
logic of the agricultural product electronic platform but are required to be called
by many functional modules in the agricultural product electronic platform.
Duplicate codes in the platform reduce the coupling degree of the electronic
platform of agricultural products;
3. Spring DAO module. This module is not related to the specific situation of
green ecological agriculture in Northeast China. Through this module system,
abnormal semantics in the platform system can be identified;
4.
Spring Web module. Common development basic functions such as file
uploading and downloading in the agricultural product electronic platform,
binding request parameters to objects, etc. are included in this module.
5. Spring MVC framework. This module is used to configure view parsing related
to green ecological agricultural products in Northeast China and to define the
priority of processing.
2.3. MYSQL DATABASE
The database supports the storage engine settings of various electronic platforms,
and there are different data types of storage methods within the electronic platforms
so the access speeds to the electronic platforms are different. In addition, the creation
of a monitoring electronic platform big data will only be used for queries, and will not
be added, deleted, or modified. Since the addition of the database supports setting
the storage engine at the table level of the electronic platform, combined with the
characteristics of green ecological agriculture in Northeast China, different storage
engines can be selected for different electronic platforms in a more targeted manner
to optimize their performance.
3. MODEL VALIDATION
With the popularization of various smart mobile devices, the promotion of
agricultural information and the promotion and sale of agricultural products can solve
the problems of difficulty in obtaining rural information, low commercialization, and
unsalable commodities. The functional test of this system is mainly based on black
boxes. Testing is the main means. Therefore, iterative training is very necessary for
the underlying data of the agricultural product electronic platform, and the model
operation accuracy can be tested through iterative training. The details are as follows:
1.
Accuracy. Precision is the proportion of positive classes that resolve to
samples identified as positive classes. The specific calculation process is as
follows:
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
98
(1)
Among them, is a true example, and is a false positive example.
2. Recall rate. Used to solve for the proportion of all positive class samples that
are correctly identified as positive classes. The specific calculation process is
as follows:
(2)
Among them, is a false negative example.
3. Accuracy is a metric used to evaluate classification models. Simply put, it is the
proportion of the total number of correct predictions by the model. The
calculation process is as follows:
(3)
Among them, is a true negative example.
We compared the different accuracy comparison models, took into account the
background of the agricultural product electronic platform and other backgrounds,
adopted appropriate algorithms for evaluation, and finally considered the accuracy
rate. In Figure 2, as the number of iterations increases, the training accuracy in the
input agricultural product information is also increasing. When the number of iterations
is 50, the accuracy of 97.33% is reached, and then the accuracy tends to stabilize; the
number of iterations is 25. The second time, the test set accuracy reached 95.34%. As
the number of iterations increases to 50, the accuracy rises to 97.52%, which shows
that our agricultural product electronic platform has high prediction accuracy for the
underlying data. The description of the data set parameters is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. The relationship between iteration accuracy and the number of interactions
recision =
TP
FP
Re
call =
TP
TP +FN
FN
Accuracy =
TP +TN
TP +TN +FP +FN
TN
Number of interactions Iteration accuracy
12.5 90.55
25 95.34
37.5 96.59
50 97.33
62.5 97.35
75 97.41
87.5 97.48
100 97.52
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
99
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
Figure 2. Iterative Accuracy Graph
4. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
For the development of green ecological agriculture in China, the rural revitalization
strategy has greatly improved the level of regional agriculture. This improvement is
related to economic benefits and the structure of agricultural allocation. However, the
substantial development of agriculture is still a double-edged sword. With the rapid
development of China's regional agriculture, its consumption of energy, the squeezing
and encroachment of the environment and the pollution of the ecological environment
have been put on the agenda. This problem largely stems from the unreasonable
management and regulation of the rapidly developing agricultural infrastructure.
Therefore, the demand and management of green ecological agriculture in China is a
top priority.
First of all, the conventional evaluation indicators of regional sustainable utilization
of agricultural resources can be used as the main evaluation indicators and guiding
principles for the demand and management of green ecological agriculture in China,
which provides a solid foundation for us to establish an effective management system.
For the evaluation index cluster of agricultural management in Northeast China, we
can regard the index cluster as a series of variables that are correlated and
complementary and have strong responsiveness to the sustainable utilization of
agricultural natural resources and agricultural socio-economic resources. The number
of elements in the variable population is large, but they are all basically continuous
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
100
distributions, so they can form an indicator vector or indicator matrix. A series of
indicators formed by various digital information outputted by the spatial database. We
have built an evaluation system for the demand and management of China's green
ecological agriculture before and introduced the construction principles and methods
in the digital system. Among them, several index systems stored in the index library
include the content of sustainable utilization of agricultural resources. In specific
applications, they can be called directly through the user interface of scientific
engineering, and then input into the evaluation model.
Specifically, the main structure of the digital information management platform of
green ecological agriculture we built is divided into variable layer, middle layer and
evaluation index layer, which is a superimposed and progressive layer structure
design. The variable layer includes the utilization rate of electronic agricultural
products, per capita green area, per capita desert land area, soil organic matter
content and per capita water resources content. The hidden environmental variables
in the middle layer are determined as natural population growth rate, desertification
development rate, soil organic matter loss rate, water resource decay rate, and
vegetation index. For the final evaluation index layer variables, we chose the
sustainable development index and the green ecological index as the final
comprehensive evaluation index.
4.1. INFLUENCE OF VARIABLE LAYER PARAMETERS OF
DIGITAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
According to the collection of a large amount of relevant data in 2017, we have
continuously revised and learned the forecasting module in the digital information
management platform of green ecological agriculture, and used the digital information
management platform to analyze various data of the variable layer during 2017-2021.
Data collection and mining were carried out. This data collection and mining comes
from multiple sources of information such as provincial agricultural bureaus,
environmental bureaus and local regional monitoring points in the Northeast region.
After processing the data, the platform retains data points that are useful for future
evaluation metrics. The annual average data collected from 2017 to 2021 were
normalized after screening to facilitate subsequent analysis and to build multiple
regression curves. The results of the analysis are shown in Figure 3. It is observed
that the use index of electronic agricultural products, the per capita greening index,
the soil organic matter content index and the per capita water content index all show
an upward trend over the years, while the per capita desert land area index shows a
decreasing index. Among the related variables, one variable is regarded as the
dependent variable, and one or more other variables are regarded as independent
variables, and a statistical analysis method is used to establish a linear or nonlinear
mathematical model quantitative relationship between multiple variables and use
sample data for analysis. The overall trend of each variable parameter has a large
change range from 2018 to 2019. It is observed that compared with 2018, the use
index of electronic agricultural products, per capita greening index, soil organic matter
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
101
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
content index and per capita water content index in 2019 are observed. Up 30.34%,
6.14%, 25.34% and 30.26% respectively. The index of per capita desert land area
decreased by 10.97%. This shows that from 2018 to 2019, the management and
control of green ecological agriculture in Northeast China achieved a more significant
effect. In the following 2019-2021 years, the changes in per capita greening index, soil
organic matter content index, per capita water content index and per capita desert
land area index tended to be stable, which indicates that the management of green
ecological agriculture in this region is in the realization of the underlying structure.
After the transformation, the government began to carry out stable development,
which is conducive to further evaluating the advantages and disadvantages brought
about by the structural transformation and providing guidance for subsequent
development.
Figure 3. Changes of each index in the variable layer with years
4.2. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT OF
GREEN ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE
Then, we forecast the variable layer data for the period 2017-2021 after using the
data collected in 2017 to revise the learning of the forecasting module within the
digital information management platform of green ecological agriculture. Effective
analysis data has been obtained. In this section, we use the prediction module in the
digital information management platform of green ecological agriculture to analyze the
output layer variables we care about. Among them, the changing trend of the
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
102
sustainable development index over the years is shown in Figure 4. An unusual
decrease in the Sustainability Index was observed during 2017-2018, with a decrease
of 0.08. This is inconsistent with the trend change results of the variable layer in
Figure 3.
Therefore, we judged and analyzed the results according to the data changes in
the middle layer. We found that the excessively large development area of farmland
makes the corresponding soil and water resources environment polluted to a certain
extent, which eventually leads to the reduction of the sustainable development index.
And with the improved measures, in 2019, the observed sustainability index increased
by 0.013, compared to the growth rate of 4.28% in 2018. This shows that the
implementation of the adjustment measures of control is feasible. From 2019 to 2021,
the growth of the sustainable development index also stabilized, at 0.317, 0.319 and
0.322, respectively.
Figure 4. Changes in the sustainable development index over the years
4.3. GREEN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF GREEN
ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE
Finally, we use the prediction module in the digital information management
platform of green ecological agriculture to analyze the changes in the green ecological
index with the development year. The results are shown in Figure 5. A smaller
increase in the green ecological index was observed during 2017-2018, at only
2.36%. As can be seen from Figures 3 and 4, this period is a critical stage for
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
103
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
structural and policy regulation. During the period from 2018 to 2019, the green
ecological index has been significantly improved, which is due to the comprehensive
results of the agricultural environment, the abundance of soil nutrients and water
resources in Figure 3, which are conducive to green and sustainable development. It
was observed that compared with 2018, the green ecological index from 2019 to 2021
increased by 5.94%, 8.58% and 12.87% respectively.
Figure 5. Changes of Green Ecological Index with Years
5. DISCUSSION
With the rapid development of China's regional agriculture, its consumption of
energy, the squeezing and encroachment of the environment and the pollution of the
ecological environment have been put on the agenda. This problem largely stems
from the unreasonable management and regulation of the rapidly developing
agricultural infrastructure. Therefore, the demand and management of green
ecological agriculture in China is a top priority. This provides a solid foundation for us
to establish an effective management system. Aiming at the evaluation index cluster
of agricultural management in Northeast China, the main structure of the digital
information management platform of green ecological agriculture we built is divided
into a variable layer, middle layer and evaluation index layer, which is a superimposed
and progressive layer structure design. We focus on the analysis of the variable layer
and the evaluation index layer. The conclusions are as follows:
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
104
1.
The overall trend of each variable parameter has a large change range from
2018 to 2019. Compared with 2018, the use index of electronic agricultural
products, per capita greening index, soil organic matter content index and per
capita water content index increased respectively in 2019 by 30.34%, 6.14%,
25.34% and 30.26%. The index of per capita desert land area decreased by
10.97%. This shows that from 2018 to 2019, the management and control of
green ecological agriculture in Northeast China achieved a more significant
effect. In the following 2019-2021 years, the per capita greening index, soil
organic matter content index, per capita water resource content index and per
capita desert land area index tended to stabilize;
2.
The sustainable development index dropped abnormally during 2017-2018,
with a drop of 0.08. This is inconsistent with the trend change results at the
variable level. This is due to the excessive development of cultivated land,
which pollutes the corresponding soil and water resources to a certain extent,
which ultimately leads to a decrease in the sustainable development index.
And with the improved measures, in 2019, the Sustainability Index rose by
0.013, compared to 4.28% in 2018. This shows that the implementation of the
adjustment measures of control is feasible. From 2019 to 2021, the growth of
the sustainable development index also stabilized, at 0.317, 0.319 and 0.322
respectively;
3.
from 2017 to 2018, the growth rate of the green ecological index was small,
only 2.36%, because this period was a key stage of structural and policy
regulation. During the period from 2018 to 2019, the green ecological index
has been significantly improved, which is a comprehensive result of the
improvement of the agricultural environment, soil nutrients and water
resources, which is conducive to green and sustainable development.
Compared with 2018, the green ecological index from 2019 to 2021 increased
by 5.94%, 8.58% and 12.87% respectively.
In the process of ecological compensation, the government should coordinate and
integrate ecological compensation funds, give unified leadership to ecological
compensation activities, coordinate management and operation, and establish a
supervision mechanism to make the process of ecological compensation open and
transparent. Barriers, it is necessary to transform the ecological compensation
mechanism of a single element into a comprehensive compensation mechanism
centered on the entire region and make overall planning and coordinated promotion,
but in the selection of compensation objects, precise compensation must be
implemented, and the compensation area must be selected reasonably, taking into
account the local area. To meet the needs of the development of residents and
enterprises, it is necessary to innovate in the way of ecological compensation,
strengthen the participation of the people, pay attention to the will of the people before
compensation, and incorporate the participation of the people into the evaluation
system of the implementation effect of ecological compensation, to improve the
participation of the people, to better play the positive force of public participation.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
105
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
REFERENCES
(1)
Manna, M., et al. (2021). Organic Farming: A Prospect for Food, Environment
and Livelihood Security in Indian Agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 170.
(2)
Rosenheim, J.A., et al. (2020). Variation in pesticide use across crops in
California agriculture: Economic and ecological drivers. Science of The Total
Environment, 733(1), 138683.
(3) Fp, A., et al. (2021). Optimizing irrigation in urban agriculture for tomato crops in
rooftop greenhouses. Science of The Total Environment, 794.
(4) Bockarjova, M., Botzen, W., & Koetse, M.J. (2020). Economic valuation of green
and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 169.
(5)
Bright, M., et al. (2021). An overlooked local resource: Shrub-intercropping for
food production, drought resistance and ecosystem restoration in the Sahel.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 319, 107523-.
(6)
Li, Z., et al. (2020). Changes in nutrient balance, environmental effects, and
green development after returning farmland to forests: A case study in Ningxia,
China. Science of The Total Environment, 735(5), 139370.
(7) Ülo, M., et al. (2018). Green and brown infrastructures support a landscape-level
implementation of ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 120, 23-35.
(8)
Sruthilaxmi, C.B., & Babu, S. (2017). Microbial bio-inoculants in Indian
agriculture: Ecological perspectives for a more optimized use. Agriculture
Ecosystems & Environment, 242, 23-25.
(9)
Muflikh, Y.N., Smith, C., & Aziz, A.A. (2021). A systematic review of the
contribution of system dynamics to value chain analysis in agricultural
development. Agricultural Systems, 189(7), 103044.
(10)
Bethwell, C., Sattler, C., & Stachow, U. (2022). An analytical framework to link
governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem
services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 53.
(11)
Hedayati, A., et al. (2021). Ash Transformation during Single-Pellet Combustion
of Agricultural Biomass with a Focus on Potassium and Phosphorus. Energy &
Fuels.
(12)
Zaman, S., et al. (2022). Interaction between agricultural production, female
employment, renewable energy, and environmental quality: Policy directions in
context of developing economies. Renewable Energy, 186.
(13) Zhang, Z., et al. (2022). Comprehensive Evaluation of Agricultural Modernization
Levels. Sustainability, 14.
(14)
Do, V.Q., et al. (2021). The Impact of Extreme Events and Climate Change on
Agricultural and Fishery Enterprises in Central Vietnam. Sustainability, 13.
(15)
Li, S., et al. (2022). Research on Energy Saving and Environmental Protection
Management Evaluation of Listed Companies in Energy Industry Based on
Portfolio Weight Cloud Model. Energies, 15.
(16) Sowiń
ska-Wierkosz, B., Wójcik-Madej, J., & Michalik-Nieek, M. (2021). An
Assessment of the Ecological Landscape Quality (ELQ) of Nature-Based
Solutions (NBS) Based on Existing Elements of Green and Blue Infrastructure
(GBI). Sustainability, 13.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023
106
(17) Gao, X., et al. (2022). Towards Sustainable Agriculture in China: Assessing the
Robust Role of Green Public Investment. Sustainability, 14.
(18) Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Guo, P. (2022). A credibility-based interval multi-objective
crop area planning model for agricultural and ecological management.
Agricultural Water Management, 269, 107687.
(19) Rawat, S., Banjare, S., & Gautam, S. (2019). Rainfall probability analysis for
crop planning in Allahabad, March. Journal of Agrometeorology, 2019(21(1)),
112-113.
(20) Banjare, S., Rawat, S., & Gautam, S. (2019). Rainfall probability analysis for
crop planning in Allahabad district of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Journal of
Agrometeorology, (1), 21.
(21) Chen, F., & Hu, Y. (2021). Agricultural and rural ecological management system
based on big data in complex system. Environmental Technology & Innovation,
22, 101390.
(22)
Rodrigo E Lorenzón, Evelina J León, Juani, M., Beltzer, A. H., & Andrés M
Attademo. (2020). Can agroecological management increase functional diversity
of birds in rice fields? Revista de Biologia Tropical, 68(3), 873-883.
(23) Leijster, V. D., Santos, M. J., Wassen, M. J., Ramos-Font, M. E., & Verweij, P. A.
(2019). Agroecological management improves ecosystem services in almond
orchards within one year. Ecosystem Services, 38(38), 2-12.
(24) Lauren, B., & Michael, M. (2018). A sustainable agricultural future relies on the
transition to organic agroecological pest management. Sustainability, 10(6),
2023-.
(25) Pan, Q., et al. (2022). An interval multi-objective fuzzy-interval credibility-
constrained nonlinear programming model for balancing agricultural and
ecological water management. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 245, 103958.
(26) Zhang, L. (2021). Non-linear response of PM2.5 pollution to land use change in
China. Remote Sensing, 13.
(27) Tasdighi, A., Arabi, M., & Osmond, D. L. (2017). The relationship between land
use and vulnerability to nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in an urban
watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality, 46(1), 1137.
(28) Li, X., et al. (2021). Loss of nitrogen and phosphorus from farmland runoff and
the interception effect of an ecological drainage ditch in the North China Plain—
A field study in a modern agricultural park. Ecological Engineering, 169, 106310.
(29) Zhu, Z., et al. (2021). Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety
of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things
technology. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101462.
(30)
Liu, X., & Kao, Z. (2022). Research on influencing factors of customer
satisfaction of e-commerce of characteristic agricultural products. Procedia
Computer Science, 199, 1505-1512.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120252.92-107
107
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 52 Iss.12 N.2 April - June, 2023