The mean value of economic resilience of the development vitality system is 0.096
in Jixi and 0.053 in Hegang, with the highest value and the lowest value in
Shuangyashan. The overall mean value is Jixi City > Shuangyashan City > Qitaihe
City > Hegang City. Overall, the economic resilience of the development vitality
system in Jixi and Shuangyashan is high in the next five years, but the level of
development vitality decreases. Hegang and Qitaihe are relatively low, but the
development vitality level will have a good development trend in the next five years.
Both Jixi City and Shuangyashan City increased by 0.003, and Qitaihe City
increased by a smaller amount. In terms of the mean value of economic resilience of
the open system, it shows Jixi City> Hegang City> Qitaihe City> Shuangyashan City.
In general, the economic toughness of the open system in Jixi and Hegang is higher
in the next five years, but the level of the open system in Hegang is weakened.
4. CONCLUSION
In response to the problems of sustainable development and low and unreasonable
industrial structure faced by resource-based cities. This paper combines the principles
of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and industrial layout optimization to evaluate and
position the current industrial structure of resource cities. The comprehensive
economic resilience system of the city is divided into six systems: city economic
revenue and expenditure capacity, innovation environment, development vitality,
stability, diversity, and openness. This paper proposes effective countermeasures for
the development planning and industrial development of resource cities. At the same
time, it provides a good reference for the industrial restructuring and sustainable
development of a large number of other domestic cities with dependent resources,
and the specific conclusions are recognized as follows:
1. In terms of the average weights of the overall economic resilience subsystems
of the four major coal cities, the main factors affecting economic resilience are
the revenue and expenditure capacity, development vitality, and innovation
environment systems. The diversity system has the least degree of influence.
In terms of the weights of the influencing factors in the four cities, the main
factors affecting Jixi city are openness, revenue and expenditure capacity, and
stability system: Hegang city is mainly influenced by the stability system,
innovation capacity system, and openness system. Shuangyashan City is
influenced by a development vitality system, innovation environment system,
and income and expenditure capacity system. The main factors affecting the
economic resilience of Qitaihe City are income and expenditure capacity,
openness, and development vitality system.
2. In terms of the weights of the influence factors of each system layer of the city,
the income and expenditure capacity system mainly affects Qitaihe City, and
the innovation environment system and the development vitality system affect
Shuangyashan City. The stability system of Hegang is most influenced by it,
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.284-304
and both the diversity system and the openness system are most influenced by
Jixi city.
REFERENCES
(1) Yu, X., Shan, L., & Wu, Y. (2021). Land Use Optimization in a Resource-
Exhausted City Based on Simulation of the F-E-W Nexus. Land, 10.
(2)
Li, J. (2020). Resource optimization scheduling and allocation for hierarchical
distributed cloud service system in smart city. Future generation computer
systems, 107(Jun.), 247-256.
(3)
Pardo-Garcia, N., Simoes, S. G., Dias, L., et al. (2019). Sustainable and
Resource Efficient Cities Platform – SureCity holistic simulation and optimization
for smart cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215(APR.1), 701-711.
(4) Shu, M., Wu, S., Wu, T., et al. (2020). Efficient energy consumption system using
heuristic renewable demand energy optimization in smart city. Computational
Intelligence.
(5)
Xia, Q. (2019). Research on the Eco-environment and Industrial Structure
Optimization of Coal Resource City. China Ancient City.
(6)
You, G., Pan, Q. (2011). Probe into Lupanshui City Frame Adjustment and
Optimization of Coal Resource Exploitation and Utilization. Coal Geology of
China.
(7) Li, S., Zhao, Y., Xiao, W., et al. (2021). Optimizing ecological security pattern in
the coal resource-based city: A case study in Shuozhou City, China. Ecological
Indicators, 130, 108026.
(8)
Oldenhuizing, J., Kraker, J. D., Valkering, P. (2013). Design of a Quality-of-Life
monitor to promote learning in a multi-actor network for sustainable urban
development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49(jun.), 74-84.
(9) Santos, T. M., Zaratan, M. L. (2017). Mineral resources accounting a technique
for monitoring the Philippine mining industry for sustainable development.
Journal of Asian Earth Science, 12(5), 142-158.
(10)
David, P., & G. Wright. (2019). Increasing returns and the genesis of American
resource abundance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 203-245.
(11)
Kaleka, A. (2012). Resources and capabilities driving competitive advantage in
export markets: Guidelines for industrial exporters. Industrial Marketing
Management, 31, 273-283.
(12)
Grander, J. A., & Scott, M. (2018). The Simple Economics of Easter Island: A
Ricardo Malthus Model of Renewable Resource Use. The American Economic
Review, 88, 119-138.
(13)
Carlaw, K. I., & Lipsey, R. G. (2012). Externalities, technological
complementarities and sustained economic growth. Research Policy, 31,
1305-1315.
(14) Martin, R. (2018). Regional Economic Resilience, Hysteresis and Recessionary
Shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.284-304
3C Tecnología. Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme. ISSN: 2254-4143
Ed.44 | Iss.12 | N.2 April - June 2023
303