We address air pollution, water pollution, and other pollution sources that need to
be dealt with for urban environmental pollution management. We establish a big data
technology framework for urban environmental pollution treatment, collect relevant
pollution data, and further use the collected data for pollution prevention and
treatment. The results are expressed as follows.
1. Between 2010 and 2020, thanks to the government's strong support for
environmental protection, the average efficiency score of environmental
pollution control in China's provinces rose from 33.67% to 63.67%, an
efficiency increase of 46%, and the efficiency of environmental pollution control
across China has been rising. At the same time, we find that there are large
regional differences in the efficiency of environmental pollution control and its
dynamics across Chinese localities generally showing a distribution pattern of
high in the east and low in the west.
2. The environmental pollution control efficiency of 17 provinces and
municipalities in China from 2010 to 2020, Guangdong's environmental
pollution control efficiency increased the most significantly, with a relative
position of 26.47%, which is at the top of the list. Inner Mongolia has the
weakest increase in environmental pollution control efficiency, with an increase
of 6.89% in relative position, and little change in environmental pollution control
efficiency when compared with other 16 provinces and cities.
3. In 2010, residents had to bear the city's sewage disposal cost of $283.56 and
garbage disposal cost of $132.59. In comparison, the cost of sewage treatment
is 2.14 times higher than the cost of garbage treatment. The overall trend
seems to be that there is a trend toward lowering the cost of municipal
wastewater treatment. In 2019, urban residents need to bear the lowest cost of
sewage treatment, which costs only 208.6 yuan, 26.44% lower than the highest
283.56 yuan in 2010. This indicates that the process of urban pollution
environment management, and sewage treatment efficiency is getting higher
and higher, and the cost that residents need to bear gradually decreases.
between 2010 and 2020, the cost of urban pollution environment treatment that
residents need to bear changed significantly, fluctuating at about 30%.
REFERENCES
(1) Shi, J., et al. (2021). Pollution control of wastewater from the coal chemical
industry in China: Environmental management policy and technical standards.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143(4), 110883.
(2) Zhang, Y., Song, Y., & Zou, H. (2020). Transformation of pollution control and
green development: Evidence from China's chemical industry. Journal of
Environmental Management, 275, 111246.
(3) Zhu, J., & Xu, J. (2022). Air pollution control and enterprise competitiveness – A
re-examination based on China's Clean Air Action. Journal of Environmental
Management, 312(6), 114968.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.204-218
(4)
Geng, et al. (2018). Research on Decision Support System (DSS) of
Atmospheric Environment Management in Anhui Province Based on Air Quality
Forecasting. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 9(04), 65-69.
(5)
Qiao, B., et al. (2017). Ship emission reduction effect evaluation of air pollution
control countermeasures. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3610-3622.
(6)
Liu, J., et al. (2020). Has the mortality risk declined after the improvement of air
quality in an ex-heavily polluted Chinese city-Lanzhou? Chemosphere,
242(Mar.), 125196.1-125196.9.
(7)
Luo, X., et al. (2020). Empirical analysis based on grey relational theory: is
industrial integration conducive to environmental pollution control and
technological innovation? In AADNIC-ABMECR 2020: The 2nd Africa-Asia
Dialogue Network International Conference on Advances in Business
Management and Electronic Commerce Research.
(8)
Hao, Y., & Zheng, S. (2017). Would environmental pollution affect home prices?
An empirical study based on China's key cities. Environmental Science &
Pollution Research.
(9)
Kamal, M., et al. (2021). Revisiting the Role of Fiscal Policy, Financial
Development, and Foreign Direct Investment in Reducing Environmental
Pollution during Globalization Mode: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Panel
Data Approaches. Energies, 14.
(10)
Zhang, Z., Duan, Y., & Zhang, W. (2019). Economic gains and environmental
costs from China's exports: Regional inequality and trade heterogeneity.
Ecological Economics, 164(OCT.), 106340.1-106340.13.
(11)
Yang, Q., et al. (2021). Comparison of the impact of China's railway investment
and road investment on the economy and air pollution emissions. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 293(7), 126100.
(12)
Xiong, J., & Xu, D. (2021). Relationship between Energy Consumption,
Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution in China. Environmental
Research.
(13)
Fang, C., et al. (2019). Modeling regional sustainable development scenarios
using the Urbanization and Eco-environment Coupler: Case study of Beijing-
Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China. The Science of the total environment,
689(NOV.1), 820.
(14)
Armeanu, D. S., et al. (2021). Understanding the multidimensional linkages
among renewable energy, pollution, economic growth and urbanization in
contemporary economies: Quantitative assessments across different income
countries' groups. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142.
(15)
Fikret, B.. (2017). Environmental governance for the anthropocene? social
ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Sustaina bility,
9(7),1232.
(16)
Wei, W., & Zhang, Q.. (2022). Evaluation of rural financial ecological
environment based on machine learning and improved neural network. Neural
computing & applications(12), 34.
(17)
Huang, Y. . (2021). Destruction process and restoration countermeasures of the
ecological environment of a comprehensive geological structure. Earth Sciences
Research Journal, 24 (4), 429-437.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44.204-218
3C Tecnología. Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme. ISSN: 2254-4143
Ed.44 | Iss.12 | N.2 April - June 2023
217