RESEARCH ON GEOLOGICAL
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND
GEOLOGICAL DISASTERS CONTROL
COUNTERMEASURES IN CHINA
Cheng Liu*
College of Articial Intelligence, Dazhou Vocational and Technical College,
Dazhou, Sichuan, 635001, China
liuchenglyl@163.com
Reception: 18/11/2022 Acceptance: 07/01/2023 Publication: 27/01/2023
Suggested citation:
L., Cheng (2023). Research on geological environment protection and
geological disasters control countermeasures in China. 3C Empresa.
Investigación y pensamiento crítico, 12(1), 186-205. https://doi.org/
10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
186
ABSTRACT
Geological disasters in mines, ecological environment and geology and
geomorphology are closely bound up with each other. To reduce or avoid economic
loss and to decrease the threat degree of geological disasters to life safety, the
protection of geological environment are formulated in this study. Specifically, this
includes taking mines that are dominated by thin bedded carbonate as the research
objects. The goals of this study include prevention and control of geological disasters
and protection of geological environment. The data are based on characteristics of
geological strata in mines collected by the exploration, and combined with the
characteristics of geomorphic environment, relevant rules aiming at the prevention
and control of geological disasters. Then, pursuant to the selection of indicators, an
evaluation system is constructed to verify the effectiveness of measures and
strategies proposed, in which the score value is converted into the corresponding
level to test the implementation effect of the measures and strategies proposed.
Through comparing the changes of the utility levels before and after the
implementation of measures and strategies proposed, it can be seen that the
geological disaster levels of the five mining areas in the study region are respectively
improved from the non-ideal levels , , , , to , , , , , with the tailings pond
leakage times less than 4 times and collapse volume less than 5m3. And, the levels of
geological environment are upgraded from levels , , , , to ideal levels , , ,
, , accomplished by the vegetation coverage rate of the mine reaching more than
35%, as well as the recovery rate of exploitation and utilization rate of tailings both
exceeding 85%, which indicates that the protection strategy proposed in this paper
has good practicality and feasibility.
KEYWORDS
Geological characteristics; Geological disasters; Geomorphic environment; Linear
weighted average method; Utility level; China
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
187
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
PAPER INDEX
ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA
3. MINE GEOLOGICAL HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL
AND GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
STRATEGY DESIGN
3.1. Rules for geological hazard prevention and control measures in
mines
3.2. Mine geological environmental protection strategy rules
4. EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR THE UTILITY OF GEOLOGICAL
DISASTER PREVENTION AND CONTROL AND GEOLOGICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES
5. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
6. DISCUSSION
7. CONCLUSION
8. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
REFERENCES
10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
188
1. INTRODUCTION
China is rich in mineral resources with huge reserves, and is one of the few large
resource countries in the world. The demand for mineral resources has been
accompanied by rapid economic development and has a long history of mining
development [1-2]. In recent years, the scale of mining has been rapidly developed
and expanded, and the development of mining resources has strongly disturbed the
geological environment [3-5]. Mining resources are providing resources for urban
construction and social development, providing industrial food for the national
economy, and accelerating economic and social development. However, it has also
triggered a series of frequent geological disasters such as ground collapse, cave-in,
and roofing, leaving behind many mining geological environment problems [6-7].
Especially, the mining geological environment problems caused by open-pit mining
are particularly serious, which put the lives of people at risk and property loss, and
become one of the important elements threatening ecological security [8-10].
With the rapid advancement of industrialization and urbanization and the
implementation of ecological civilization construction strategy, along with the massive
mining and range expansion of mines, the geological environment problems of mines
have become increasingly prominent and the degree of ecological damage has
become more and more serious, leading to serious geological disaster problems in
mines [11-14]. Especially on abandoned mines around urban areas and within the
visual range along important traffic arteries, the resulting destruction of vegetation,
exposed hills and land damage have a bad impact on the city image and ecological
environment [15-19]. Mine geological hazards have become a hot issue of public
concern and social attention, and gradually evolved into a major obstacle to social and
economic development, making the prevention of geological hazards and ecological
environment restoration and management increasingly a common demand [20-22].
Therefore, it is urgent to vigorously implement comprehensive remediation of
mining geological environment, repair the ecological environment of mining areas,
improve the level of scientific land use and further improve the image of the city. This
has not only become a major issue concerning urban development and ecological
civilization construction, but also an effective means to eliminate geological disasters
and guarantee the safety of people's lives and properties. Besides, it is also an
important initiative to make full use of mining resources, promote economic
development, ensure social stability and improve ecological civilization construction
[23-25].
The environmental problems of mining areas have been widely concerned and
valued by societies in various countries. For example, the literature [26] explored the
intensive use of magnetic resonance populations, taking Yangquan, China, as an
example, from the scientific connotation of magnetic resonance populations, and
proposed a dynamic improvement path to enhance the intensive use, thus filling the
gap in this field. The background conditions of the mine and the basic cases of the
corresponding mining enterprises, both of which are indicators presented by the
resource itself in the process of converting minerals into useful products, constitute
the basic framework for identifying and enhancing the intensive use of mineral
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
189
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
resources. The results show that mining enterprises are the core of intensive
utilization, the mining recovery rate contributes most to the intensive utilization of
resources, and the mine size does have an impact on the intensive utilization of
resources, but the impact will gradually decrease when a certain size is reached.
Therefore, from the perspective of enterprise governance, a corresponding dynamic
improvement path is adopted in an attempt to increase the degree of intensification. In
the literature [27], a Bayesian belief network probabilistic prediction framework was
developed to support practical and cost-effective decision making for decentralized
disposal management. This approach allows the incorporation of expert knowledge in
cases where data are insufficient for modeling. The performance of the model was
validated using field data from actively managed mine sites and was found to be
consistent in predicting soil erosion and ground cover. In the literature [28], stability
studies were carried out for weathered toxic sand mine wastes of amorphous iron
arsenate/pyrochlore using different doses of modifiers, as determined by X-ray
diffraction and polarized light microscopy, to evaluate the effectiveness of such
treatments using batch and column leaching methods. Under the equilibrium
conditions imposed by the applied standard batch leaching tests, both treatments
achieved significant reductions in leachable arsenic concentrations under their optimal
conditions, making the mine wastes acceptable in controlled landfills as defined by
international legislation. The literature [29] investigated dust pollution in open-pit coal
mines in cold regions and explored its main influencing factors. The dust pollution
characteristics were determined by statistical analysis, and the main influencing
factors of dust concentration in different seasons were calculated using the integrated
gray correlation. A hybrid single-particle Lagrangian integral trajectory model was
used to simulate the dust pollution from the mine to the surrounding area. Based on
the results of the study, an optimal mine design strategy was designed to better
control dust in mining and adjacent areas, especially in winter. The literature [30]
focused on underground mining in Pakistan, using the decision matrix risk
assessment method to assess events based on their severity and probability, and
based on the results of the resulting study, proposed management measures that
would help avoid mining accidents by applying occupational safety and health
regulations issued by the Ministry of Mines. The above approach is mainly manifested
in the shift from static implementation of environmental policies and standards to the
implementation of dynamic management. There is a shift from a single management
tool to strengthening cooperation between government departments and mining
companies and enhancing the environmental protection capacity of mining
companies. However, with the huge impact of mining environmental problems on
economic development, social progress and ecological environment, there is still a
need to continuously carry out research on mining environmental problems.
The large-scale development and utilization of mineral resources has caused
serious geohazards and geological environmental problems, and there is a certain
connection between this problem and geomorphological feature. Based on this, this
paper develops a geohazard prevention and control measure and geological
environmental protection strategy consisting of three strategic points each, based on
the geological and geomorphological features of the study area. Using the United
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
190
Nations Commission on Sustainable Development's menu-based multi-indicator type
indicator system approach, an evaluation indicator system for verifying the specific
effectiveness of prevention and control measures and protection strategies is
constructed for the reference of management and mining enterprises. The ultimate
goal is to minimize the damage to the geological environment of mines and to restore
it gradually.
2. GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA
A mine with thin-layered carbonate rocks as the main mineral resource was
selected as the study object, and the geological and geomorphological features of the
mine are shown in Figure 1. The stratigraphy of the study area mainly includes
Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic. According to the lithological
characteristics, the stratigraphy of the mine area can be divided into two sets of rock
systems, namely the Triassic mud and sandstone rock system, and the carbonate
rock system below the Triassic system. The primary sedimentary chain soil deposits
are distributed in the stratum of carbonate rock system on the upper side, underlain by
thick-layered carbonate rocks, and the rocks below the primary sedimentary chain soil
deposits are light in color, pure and with little lithological variation. The rocks above
the primary sedimentary silver earth ore layer are mostly thin-layered carbonate rocks
with dark color, high lithological variation and muddy interlayer. The Triassic siltstone
is mostly a fine-grained shoulder structure with tuffaceous components. The
lithological characteristics of the mine stratigraphy can be summarized as the
complete development process of the opening, expansion, interrupted surface and
closing of the Right River Basin. The Right River Basin opened in the middle
Devonian, and no pre-Devonian stratigraphic basement is exposed in the mine area,
which cannot reflect the characteristics of the stratigraphic interface of the basin
opening. The petrographic situation of the stratigraphy of the mine area indicates that
the mine has a terrace tectonic nature and basically maintains a terrace shallow water
depositional environment from the Devonian, although it also shows a temporary
increase in water depth, but does not change the terrace nature. Therefore, the
geography of the area generally belongs to a terrace environment in 31the Right River
Basin.
The selected mines are located from southwest to northeast of the Right River,
Bujian River and Pingzhi River, all of which are oriented in a northwesterly direction,
forming a pattern of distribution between karst landforms and river landforms. On the
southwest side of the Right River are the No. 1 and No. 2 mines, between the Right
River and the Bujian River is the No. 3 mine, and between the Bujian River and the
Pingzhi River are the No. 4 and No. 5 mines. The mining area is mainly divided into
two types of landforms, karst and river valley. The karst landforms are mainly
composed of mountainous positive terrain, and the river valley landforms are
distributed in the negative terrain of the basin. The geomorphology of the mine area is
mainly controlled by lithology and tectonics, and constitutes a combination of lithologic
and tectonic geomorphology. The lithological control shows that the karst landform is
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
191
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
developed in the carbonate stratum of the former Triassic, and the river landform is
developed in the Triassic mudstone stratum. The tectonic control shows that the karst
landforms are developed in the back-sloping core and the fluvial landforms are
developed in the diagonal core. Since the geological and geomorphic features of the
mine have not been discussed much in previous studies, the geology and
geomorphology of the target area are combined in a comprehensive study to lay the
foundation for the development of subsequent geological hazard prevention and
control measures and geological environmental protection strategies.
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the geological features of the study area
3. MINE GEOLOGICAL HAZARD PREVENTION AND
CONTROL AND GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION STRATEGY DESIGN
Based on the geological features of the study area, the geological hazard
prevention and control measures and geological environmental protection strategies
shown in Table 1 are formulated.
Table 1 Mine geohazard prevention and control and geological environmental protection
strategy
Strategic objectives Strategy points
Geological disaster prevention and control
Disaster monitoring
Landslide prevention and control
Prevention and control of sudden water
Geological environmental protection
Fulfill regulatory responsibilities in accordance
with the law and implement the main responsibility
of enterprises
Improve the technology content and level of mine
environmental protection
Exploring new ways to develop and manage mines
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
192
3.1. RULES FOR GEOLOGICAL HAZARD PREVENTION AND
CONTROL MEASURES IN MINES
(1) Mine geological disaster monitoring is the basic work in mine geological disaster
prevention and control. The main purpose of mine geological disaster monitoring is to
understand the changes of mine geological environment in time and space, analyze
the relationship between mining and mine geological environment changes, and
provide basic reference information for formulating mine geological environmental
protection measures and improving mine geological environment. In the specific mine
geological disaster prevention and control process, reasonable and effective
monitoring technology should be used according to the needs of mine geological
environment monitoring, and mine terrain monitoring instruments should be
developed. Introduce advanced mining geological environment monitoring technology,
such as modern information collection technology, Zigbee wireless networking
technology, modern network communication technology, etc., to effectively monitor
and prevent mining geological disasters, so as to reduce the casualties and economic
losses caused by mining geological disasters.
(2) In order to effectively manage mining geological hazards, it is necessary to do a
good job of preventing and controlling crumbling. First, reduce the height of the steps.
For areas where there are a lot of weathered and broken or soft structural surfaces,
the self-weight should be reduced by using measures to lower the height or slow
down the slope, and the height of the steps should be controlled within 9 meters.
Second, interception of rolling rocks. For areas where rolling rocks occur frequently,
not only do you need to set up warning signs, but you also need to set up intercepting
structures at the foot of the slope. For example, production stripping can be dumped
to stop rolling rocks and debris at a location away from the foot of the slope. Thirdly,
when horizontal blasting operations are carried out at the end of mining, it is
necessary to use slope residual cracking blasting and hole-by-hole seismic control
blasting technology to alleviate blasting damage to the slope, thereby preventing the
generation of crumbling disasters.
(3) The problem of sudden water is one of the key problems in mining geological
hazards, which requires corresponding prevention and control measures, which can
be carried out in the following aspects. First, mine-waterproofing. In the process of
mine waterproofing, measures need to be taken to prevent water from flowing into the
mine and to effectively control the inflow. In this way, it can reduce the amount of
water gushing into the mine, save the cost of drainage, reduce the cost of coal
production and prevent water damage from the root of the problem. Second, mine
drainage. In order to remove mine water, drainage ditches, water bins and pumps in
mine tunnels can be used.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
193
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
3.2. MINE GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
STRATEGY RULES
(1) In order to effectively protect the mine geological environment, an annual
treatment plan should be implemented and a sound monitoring network for the mine
geological environment should be established. Dynamic monitoring of mine geological
environment, regular reporting of mine geological environment to the competent
natural resources department at the county level where the mine is located, and
submission of real monitoring information. In addition, the relevant departments
should target the mining right holder to fulfill the obligations of mine geological
environmental protection and treatment and restoration. And establish a system of
supervision and inspection, and use the results of supervision and inspection as the
procedure for applying for the continuation, change and transfer of mining rights. In
addition, the sampling of corporate information social disclosure should be a key
review. The relevant departments also need to use remote sensing monitoring data of
the mining geological environment to detect and dispose of illegal mining practices in
a timely manner.
(2) Rely on scientific and technological progress and technological innovation to
improve the level of geological environmental protection in mines. Strengthen the
development and application of new technologies, new techniques and new methods,
increase investment in science and technology, and promote technological progress in
comprehensive utilization of resources. In addition, funding should also be
strengthened for research fields such as mining environmental geology. Research on
the impact of mine development on the geological environment and prevention and
control technologies, research on the treatment of the three wastes of mining industry
and waste recovery and comprehensive utilization technologies, and research on
advanced mining and selection technologies and processing and utilization
technologies, so as to achieve the purpose of protecting the geological environment of
mines.
(3) Comprehensive consideration of mineral resources planning, mine geological
environment protection and management planning, ecological environment planning,
etc. Government departments should give priority to the geological environment
management of mines within the visual range of the "three zones and two lines". For
the remaining scattered resources, the mountain does not have the conditions for
restoration and there are potential safety hazards, if it is in line with the mineral
resources plan, the mining rights should be reset. If it does not conform to the mineral
resources plan, it can be disposed of by the relevant government department where
the mine is located in accordance with the principles of government-led, expert-
evaluated, strict control and clear responsibility, and the corresponding residual
resources will be used for geological environment treatment.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
194
4. EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR THE UTILITY OF
GEOLOGICAL DISASTER PREVENTION AND
CONTROL AND GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION STRATEGIES
In order to effectively and accurately analyze the specific utility of the developed
geohazard prevention and geological environmental protection strategies for the study
area and to establish a reasonable evaluation index system, the prerequisite is to
solve several problems. The first is the scientific nature of the indicators. The second
is the operability and measurability of the indicators. The third is the conciseness of
the metrics. Based on the above starting point, after fully considering the impact of the
geological features of the mine on geological hazards and geological environment,
reference is made to the sustainable development index system proposed by various
units and departments. And using the method of the United Nations Commission on
Sustainable Development menu-type multi-indicator type indicator system, it is
proposed to construct the evaluation index system of mine geohazard condition and
geological environmental level from two major first-level indicators and 13 second-
level indicators. Thus, the specific utility of geological disaster prevention and control
and geological environmental protection strategies can be verified. The weights of the
indicators in this index system can also be obtained through hierarchical analysis
[31-33]. For details, see Table 2.
Table 2 Evaluation system of the utility of geological disaster prevention and control and
geological environmental protection strategies
A percentage system was implemented, and the linear weighted average method
was used for the calculation of the scores [34-35]. Based on the calculation principles
Level 1 indicators Secondary index
Level of geological hazards
Collapse volume/m3
Landslide volume/m3
Debris flow material source volume/t
Ground collapse range/m2
Number of tailing pond leaks/time
Level of geological
environment
Water quality index
Soil quality index
Vegetation coverage rate/%
Land leveling degree
Mining recovery rate/%
Tailings utilization rate/%
Mineral processing water reuse rate/%
Ecological restoration rate/%
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
195
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
and formulas of the weighted average method, a linear calculation model was
established in turn. Based on the assessment team members' weights, the score of
each index element in the lowest level index was calculated, and the calculation
model was.
(1)
Where represents the rating of each member of the group for level
indicators;
represents the weight of the assessment group members for each indicator
element of level indicators;
represents the number of assessment group
members, .
Based on the index content weights, the weighted average score of each level
index is calculated from bottom to top, and the calculation model is:
(2)
Where represents the score of each indicator in level ;
represents the
weight of each indicator in level ;
represents the number of indicators,
.
The index is scored according to the description of the index, and the score is
written in the score column, and the full score of each level 2 index is 100. The score
of each level 1 indicator can be calculated by adding up the scores of all level 2
indicators. Among them, the degree of geohazard is a negative indicator, and the
smaller the value of the second-level indicator, the lower the degree of geohazard,
and the larger the value of the first-level indicator. The specific scoring method for
each indicator is described below.
(1) Collapse volume: full marks are given when the volume of collapse is below
5m3, otherwise 0~90 marks are given as appropriate.
(2) Landslide volume: when the volume of landslide is less than 10m3
, full marks
will be given, otherwise 0~90 marks will be given as appropriate.
(3) Mudslide source volume: full marks are given when the mudslide source volume
is less than 3t, and 0~90 marks are given if the requirement is not met.
(4) The scope of ground collapse: when the ground collapse range of less than 6m2
scored full points, otherwise 0 ~ 90 points as appropriate.
(5) tailing pond leakage number: full marks when the tailing pond leakage number
is less than 4 times, otherwise 0~90 marks will be given as appropriate.
(6) Water quality index: full marks when the water quality index is above 7.9, and
0~90 marks when the requirement is not met.
(7) Soil quality index: full score when the soil quality index is greater than 8.2, and
0~90 points as appropriate when the requirement is not met.
1
n
j ij ij
i
Q P Q
=
=
ij
P
j
ij
Q
i
1, 2,i n=
1
n
w cw cw
c
S P Q
=
=
cw
P
w
cw
Q
w
c
1, 2,c n=
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
196
(8) Vegetation cover: full marks are given when the vegetation cover of the mine
area reaches 35% or more, otherwise 0~90 marks are given as appropriate.
(9) Land leveling: full marks will be awarded when the land leveling exceeds 9,
otherwise 0~90 marks will be awarded as appropriate.
(10) Mining recovery rate: full marks will be awarded when the mining recovery rate
is above 85%, otherwise 0~90 marks will be awarded as appropriate.
(11) Tailings utilization rate: full marks are given when the tailings utilization rate is
above 85%, and 0~90 marks are given as appropriate when the requirement is not
met.
(12) Repeated utilization rate of mineral processing water: full marks will be given
when the repeated utilization rate of mineral processing water is more than 80%,
otherwise 0~90 marks will be given as appropriate.
(13) Ecological recovery rate: the ecological recovery rate of the geological
environment is relative to the ecological damage. The destruction of the ecology of the
mining environment can be understood as a change in the structure, degradation or
loss of function of the ecosystem, and disturbance of relationships. Ecological
restoration is about restoring the rational structure, efficient functions and harmonious
relationships of the ecosystem [35]. Ecological restoration is essentially the process of
orderly succession of the destroyed ecosystem, a process that makes it possible to
restore the ecosystem to its native state [36]. However, due to the complexity of
natural conditions and the influence of human society's orientation toward the use of
natural resources, ecological restoration does not mean that the restored ecosystem
can or must be left in its original state in all cases. Ecological restoration rate refers to
the percentage of the restored area to the total area of the abandoned land after the
implementation of ecological engineering for those abandoned land caused by mining
stripping land, waste mine pits, tailing pits, tailings, slag, gangue, and wastewater
sediment of ore dressing and washing. For the historical ecological problems, the
indicator reaches 30% or more full marks [37]. For the area of mining and restoration
at the same time, full marks will be given when the indicator reaches 70% or more;
otherwise, 0~90 marks will be given as appropriate.
To sum up, when the final score range of the primary index is 90~100, the
geohazard situation and geological environmental condition of the study target are
excellent, and the disaster level and environmental level are set to class I [38-39]. It
indicates that the strategy utility can be given full play, and has played an excellent
prevention and protection effect. When the final score range is 80~90, the geohazard
situation and geological environmental condition of the study target is good, and the
grade is set to class II. It indicates that the prevention and protection effect of the
strategy is strong. When the score range is 65~80, the geohazard situation and
geological environmental condition of the mine is average, and the level of disaster
and environmental level is set to class III. This indicates that the strategy has certain
effect of geological disaster prevention and geological environmental protection.
When the score range is 55~65, the geohazard situation and geological
environmental condition of the area is poor, and the level is set to class
, which
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
197
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
means the developed strategy is not able to manage and protect the geohazard and
ecological environment well. When the score range of the primary index is 0~55, the
target's geohazard situation and geological environmental condition is extremely poor.
The hazard level and environment level are set to class V, which means the
developed strategy basically does not have any effect on the management and
protection of geological hazards and ecological environment in the study area.
5. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
By consulting the statistical yearbook of the city where the mine is located, the data
of each index of the five divisions of the target mine were collected one year before
and one year after the implementation of the strategy. After scoring with the utility
evaluation system, the scores of geohazard degree and geological environmental
level before and after the implementation of the strategy were obtained. After dividing
the scores according to the levels, the utility evaluation results of the prevention and
protection strategies were obtained as shown in Figure 2.
(a) Geological disaster prevention and control utility
(b) Utility of geological environmental protection
12345
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Grade
Mining Area No
Before strategy implementation
After strategy implementation
12345
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Grade
Mining Area No
Before strategy implementation
After strategy implementation
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
198
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the utility of geohazard control and geological environmental
protection strategies
By comparing the changes in the level of geological hazards before and after the
implementation of the strategy in Figure 2(a), it can be seen that the level of
geological hazards in the five mining areas in this study area before the geological
hazard control measures were carried out were V, IV, V, V and IV levels. This
indicates that the mine is characterized by geological lithology such as large changes
in Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic lithologies, increased muddy
interlayers, fine-grained shoulder structure, tuff-bearing components and other
geological lithologies, resulting in a large footprint for crumbling and slag disposal and
a large impact area for ground collapse, leading to a relatively serious degree of
geological disaster.
Through targeted and reasonable geological hazard prevention and control
measures for different mining areas, the level of geological hazards in the target area
is upgraded to class II, , , and .
For small collapse hazards in No.1 mine, the slope is cut to reduce the load and
remove dangerous rocks to release the danger, and the large collapse is reinforced by
anchor spraying method as a whole, paying attention to strengthen drainage. The
surface of the collapsed mining area is re-leveled, the collapse pits and cracks are
filled in, and interception ditches and drainage ditches are constructed to prevent the
ground from pouring into the mine and causing landslides. The level of geological
disaster was changed from V to II.
For the No. 2 mine, advanced mining technology is implemented, such as: using
waste rock, slag or tailing sand to fill the mining area, which controls and slows down
the surface subsidence and the collapse behavior and magnitude of the mining area,
and also reduces the problem of massive land encroachment by slag and tailing sand,
which changes the level of geological hazard from IV to I.
Due to the poor background conditions of the geological environment in mine site
No. 3, the catchment area, landslide volume and relative height difference are large,
and the tailings pond leakage breach is obvious. Therefore, anti-slip rock stacks, anti-
slip retaining walls, anti-slip piles and anti-slip piles were constructed at different
locations of the landslide body in the mine. The overall anchoring measures were
taken to improve the friction and shear strength of the landslide body and enhance the
overall stability of the landslide body. And plant trees and grass on the surface of the
landslide body to prevent soil erosion and mudflow on the slope surface. During the
operation of the tailing ponds, supervision and management were strengthened, and
proper operation was carried out to prevent tailings sand overflow and dam failure
more effectively. For tailings ponds that have breached or have the potential to
breach, works were arranged to repair and reinforce them. When building new tailing
ponds, extra attention was paid to site selection, and tailing ponds were built at
locations higher than the highest flood level in the calendar year, and it was explicitly
prohibited to dig and build tailing ponds on existing river floodplains. The tailing ponds
were designed with safety and stability in mind, ensuring that the drainage and flood
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
199
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
control systems were complete, and that quality and quantity were maintained during
construction to prevent a recurrence of the dam failure and change the geological
hazard level from V to I.
The main problem of No. 4 mine is the large size of the landslide, and part of the
shed is built under the slag pile. When heavy rain comes, it will cause casualties, and
there is a huge potential danger of collapse above the shed. Therefore, measures
were taken to reduce the height or slow down the slope to reduce the self-weight, and
the height of the steps was controlled within 9 meters, and intercepting structures
were set at the foot of the slope, which greatly solved the problem of landslide and
reduced the degree of geological disaster. The level of geological hazard was
changed from class V to class II.
No. 5 mine is a large state-owned enterprise, according to the demand of mine
geological environment monitoring, using reasonable and effective monitoring
technology, developing mine terrain monitoring instruments, introducing advanced
mine geological environment monitoring technology, constructing slag mudflow and
accident pool collapse potential hazard management project, effectively monitoring
and preventing mine geological disasters, controlling the magnitude of ground
collapse, not only basically eliminating the previous existence of slag mudflow and
accident pool collapse potential hazard, but also reducing the casualties and
economic losses caused by mine geological disasters, changing the level of
geological disasters from class IV to class II.
From the change of geological environmental level grade before and after the
implementation of geological environmental protection strategy (see Figure 2(b)), it
can be seen that before the implementation of geological environmental protection
strategy, the geological environmental level grades of the five mining areas were class
, , ,
and V, with poor ecological and environmental benefits. And one year
after the implementation of the geological environmental protection strategy, the level
of geological environmental level in the study area increased dramatically to class II,
II, II, I, II. It shows that the protection strategy has given full play to its effectiveness
and has excellent protection and restoration effects. It has greatly improved the
ecological environment of the mine and brought the ecology into balance gradually.
For example, the No. 1 mine area has a high number of mining pits, resulting in low
vegetation coverage, serious soil erosion and high content of heavy metals in water
and soil. By implementing the annual treatment plan, a sound monitoring network of
mine geological environment is established. Dynamic monitoring of the geological
environment of mines, regular to the mine location of the county-level natural
resources authorities, report the geological environment of mines, submit real
monitoring information. Using the remote sensing monitoring data of mine geological
environment, illegal mining behaviors are detected and disposed of in a timely
manner. It not only effectively protects the geological and ecological environment of
mines, but also makes the mining and other activities of mines more standardized, so
that the level of geological environment level rises from class to class .
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
200
In dealing with the geological environment of No. 2 mine, we based on the results
of the surface engineering treatment. Considering the mineral resources planning,
mine geological environment protection and treatment planning, ecological
environment planning, etc., the geological environment treatment of the mine within
the visual range of "three zones and two lines" was completed as a priority. The
geological environment level of the mine has been upgraded from class IV to class II.
The heavy metal pollution of water and soil in No. 3 mine is more serious. On the
basis of the project to raise and reinforce the tailing reservoir dike, the tailing sand
was covered with soil 0.5~0.8m thick. Then trees, grass and crops were planted, so
that the ecosystem of the mine was well protected. And gradually restored to a benign
ecological level, so that the level of its geological environmental level rose from IV to
II.
In response to the low vegetation cover in mine 4, the same conservation strategy
as in mine 3 was adopted. Trees, grass and crops are planted in the 0.5~0.8m thick
overburden. After mining, treatment and protection at the same time, the mine is
reclaimed and re-greened in time to change the vicious ecosystem structure, restore
the ecological function and stabilize the ecological balance. Make the ecosystem
structure of the mine more reasonable, more efficient in function and more
coordinated in relationship. Eventually, the level of geological environment will be
upgraded from V to I.
For mine site No. 5, the accident pond is used for primary sedimentation treatment
of mine pit wastewater. The suspended mineral dust in the water is retained and the
pollution of surface water is reduced. A water purification system is also specially
designed for the drainage outlet of the tailing pond to realize the recycling of water
resources and the recovery of residual gold. Through the treatment of the three
mining wastes and waste recycling, the purpose of protecting the geological
environment has been truly realized, and the level of geological environment has been
upgraded from V to II.
6. DISCUSSION
The geohazard prevention and control measures and geological environment
protection strategies proposed in this paper for the geological features of mines,
although certain research results have been achieved, there are still many
shortcomings, mainly containing the following points.
(1) Only the geological and geomorphological characteristics of the study area
were analyzed, which is not comprehensive. In future research, it is necessary to face
several mines, summarize the geohazard prevention and control measures and
geological environment protection methods of different mines, and propose
remediation strategies suitable for universal mines.
(2) The geohazard prevention and control measures are mainly based on the
management of geological hazards such as landslides, landslides and debris flows,
and the geological environment protection strategy is mainly based on restoring the
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
201
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
quality of water and soil, expanding vegetation coverage and improving resource
utilization. Although the ecological environment of the mine is protected to a certain
extent, the ways and means are too single, so in the future research, we should
consider many aspects and integrate multiple perspectives to explore a more
systematic protection scheme.
7. CONCLUSION
The large-scale development and utilization of mineral resources has made human
beings enjoy the benefits brought by natural resources while also suffering from a
series of bitter consequences such as environmental pollution, resource destruction
and ecological degradation. Especially, some local mining areas with large-scale
predatory mining have caused serious geological disasters and geological
environment problems. Therefore, the research on the prevention and control of
geological disasters and the protection of geological environment seems to be urgent.
Therefore, based on the geological features of the study area, this paper formulates
the details of the prevention and control measures for mine geological hazards and
the protection strategy for mine geological environment, and uses the hierarchical
analysis method to obtain the index weights of the utility evaluation system. The utility
of the proposed measures and strategies was verified through the scoring results and
ranking of the linear weighted average method, and the following research findings
were obtained.
(1) According to the needs of mine geological environment monitoring, use
reasonable and effective monitoring technology, develop mine terrain monitoring
instruments, and introduce advanced mine geological environment monitoring
technology, which can effectively monitor and prevent mines geological disasters.
(2) For the collapse phenomenon of geological disasters, the ground collapse
magnitude can be greatly controlled by reducing the height of steps, intercepting
rolling rocks, using slope residual cracking blasting and hole-by-hole seismic
reduction control blasting technology, and preventing the occurrence of slope erosion,
slope debris flow, tailing sand spill and dam failure. The volume of landslide is less
than 10m3 and the ground collapse area is less than 6m2.
(3) the establishment of a sound mine geological environment monitoring network,
regular to the county-level natural resources departments in charge of the mine
location, report the mine geological environment. It can obtain the impact of mine
development on the geological environment in real time and take relevant initiatives in
time to increase the greening coverage of the collapse area, protect the ecosystem
and restore it to a benign ecological level, and optimize the geological environment
level from class , , , , to class , , , respectively. Raise the water quality
index and soil quality index to above 7.9 and 8.2 respectively.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
202
8. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/
supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
REFERENCES
(1) Meyer J M, Kokaly R F, Holley E. Hyperspectral remote sensing of white mica: A
review of imaging and point-based spectrometer studies for mineral
resources, with spectrometer design considerations[J].
Remote Sensing of
Environment, 2022, 275:113000-.
(2) Toro N, E Gálvez, Saldaa M, et al.
Submarine mineral resources: A potential
solution to political conflicts and global warming[J]. Minerals Engineering,
2022, 179:107441-.
(3) Peng L I, Cai M F.
Challenges and new insights for exploitation of deep
underground metal mineral resources[J].
Transactions of Nonferrous Metals
Society of China, 2021, 31(11):3478-3505.
(4) Shang Y, Lu S, Gong J, Liu R, Li X, Fan Q.
Improved genetic algorithm for
economic load dispatch in hydropower plants and comprehensive
performance comparison with dynamic programming method.
Journal of
Hydrology, 2017, 554: 306-316.
(5) He F, Liu C, Liu H. Integration and Fusion of Geologic Hazard Data under Deep
Learning and Big Data Analysis Technology[J]. Complexity, 2021.
(6) Lu S, Shang Y, Li W, Peng Y, Wu X. Economic benefit analysis of joint operation
of cascaded reservoirs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 179:731-737.
(7) Kharisova O, Kharisov T. Searching for possible precursors of mining-induced
ground collapse using long-term geodetic monitoring data[J]. Engineering
Geology, 2021, 289:106173-.
(8) Liang Y, Chen X, Yang J, et al. Analysis of ground collapse caused by shield
tunnelling and the evaluation of the reinforcement effect on a sand stratum[J].
Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 115:104616.
(9) Shang Y, You B, Shang L.
China’s environmental strategy towards reducing
deep groundwater exploitation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75:1439.
(10) Chernos M, Macdonald R J, Straker J, et al. Simulating the cumulative effects of
potential open-pit mining and climate change on streamflow and water quality
in a mountainous watershed[J]. Science of The Total Environment
, 2022,
806:150394-.
(11) Zuo Z, Guo H, Cheng J, et al.
How to achieve new progress in ecological
civilization construction? – Based on cloud model and coupling coordination
degree model[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127(1):107789.
(12) Poveda-Bautista R, Gonzalez-Urango H, E Ramírez-Olivares, et al. Engaging
Stakeholders in Extraction Problems of the Chilean Mining Industry through a
Combined Social Network Analysis-Analytic Network Process Approach[J].
Complexity, 2022, 2022.
(13) Zhang JShang Y, Cui M, Luo Q, Zhang R.
Successful and sustainable
governance of the lower Yellow River, China: A floodplain utilization approach
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
203
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
for balancing ecological conservation and development, Environment,
Development and Sustainability, 2022, 243014-3038.
(14) Mvdha B, Mbb C, Kd A, et al.
Changes in soil microbial communities in post
mine ecological restoration: Implications for monitoring using high
throughput DNA sequencing[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 749.
(15) Chun S J, Kim Y J, Cui Y, et al. Ecological network analysis reveals distinctive
microbial modules associated with heavy metal contamination of abandoned
mine soils in Korea[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 289:117851-.
(16) Yan Y, Mao K, Shen X, et al.
Evaluation of the influence of ENSO on tropical
vegetation in long time series using a new indicator[J]. Ecological Indicators,
2021, 129:107872.
(17) Che D.
Investigation of Vegetation Changes in Different Mining Areas in
Liaoning Province, China, Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data[J]. Remote
Sensing, 2021, 13.
(18) Yan M, Li T, Li X, et al.
Microbial biomass and activity restrict soil function
recovery of a post-mining land in eastern Loess Plateau[J]. Catena
, 2021,
199(8):105107.
(19) Midor K, Biay W, Rogala-Rojek J, et al. The Process of Designing the Post-
Mining Land Reclamation Investment Using Process Maps. Case Study[J].
Energies, 2021, 14.
(20) Xiao W, Zhang W, Ye Y, et al.
Is underground coal mining causing land
degradation and significantly damaging ecosystems in semi-arid areas? A
study from an Ecological Capital perspective[J]. L
and Degradation &
Development, 2020, 31.
(21) Ross M, Nippgen F, Mcglynn B L, et al.
Mountaintop mining legacies constrain
ecological, hydrological and biogeochemical recovery trajectories[J].
Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16(7):075004.
(22) Arifeen H M, Chowdhury M S, Zhang H, et al.
Role of a Mine in Changing Its
Surroundings—Land Use and Land Cover and Impact on the Natural
Environment in Barapukuria, Bangladesh[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13.
(23) Liu H, Yan F, Tian H.
Towards low-carbon cities: Patch-based multi-objective
optimization of land use allocation using an improved non-dominated sorting
genetic algorithm-II[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 134(4):108455.
(24) Bernatek-Jakiel A, Jakiel M.
Identification of soil piping-related depressions
using an airborne LiDAR DEM: Role of land use changes[J]. Geomorphology,
2021, 378.
(25) Wang Y, Yu L.
Can the current environmental tax rate promote green
technology innovation? - Evidence from China's resource-based industries[J].
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 278(2):123443.
(26) Wei J, Zhang J, Wu X, et al. Governance in mining enterprises: An effective way
to promote the intensification of resources—Taking coal resources as an
example[J]. Resources Policy, 2022, 76:102623-.
(27) Ghahramani A, Bennett M L, Ali A, et al.
A Risk-Based Approach to Mine-Site
Rehabilitation: Use of Bayesian Belief Network Modelling to Manage
Dispersive Soil and Spoil[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023
204
(28) ALvarez-Ayuso E, Murciego A.
Stabilization methods for the treatment of
weathered arsenopyrite mine wastes: Arsenic immobilization under selective
leaching conditions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 283:125265.
(29) Wang Z, Zhou W, Jiskani I M, et al. Annual dust pollution characteristics and its
prevention and control for environmental protection in surface mines[J].
Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 825:153949-.
(30) Cheng X, Yang F, Zhang R, et al. Petrogenesis and geodynamic implications of
Early Palaeozoic granitic rocks at the Hongshi Cu deposit in East Tianshan
Orogenic Belt, NW China: Constraints from zircon U–Pb geochronology,
geochemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopes[J]. Geological Journal, 2020, 55(3).
(31) JG López, Sisto R, Benayas J, et al.
Assessment of the Results and
Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities[J].
Sustainability, 2021, 13.
(32) Lee K H, Noh J, Khim J S.
The Blue Economy and the United Nations'
sustainable development goals: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Environment
international, 2020, 137:105528.
(33) Karymbalis E, Andreou M, Batzakis D V, et al.
Integration of GIS-Based
Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Flood-
Hazard Assessment in the Megalo Rema River Catchment (East Attica,
Greece) [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13.
(34) Xie X, Xu Y, Dong Z Y, et al. Multi-Objective Coordinated Dispatch of High Wind-
Penetrated Power Systems against Transient Instability[J].
IET Generation
Transmission & Distribution, 2020, 14(19).
(35) Sun Q, Yang G, Zhou A.
An Entropy-Based Self-Adaptive Node Importance
Evaluation Method for Complex Networks[J]. Complexity, 2020, 2020(10):1-13.
(36) Chen A, Yang X, Guo J, et al. Synthesized remote sensing-based desertification
index reveals ecological restoration and its driving forces in the northern
sand-prevention belt of China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 131:108230-.
(37) Dong S, Wang G, Kang Y, et al.
Soil water and salinity dynamics under the
improved drip-irrigation scheduling for ecological restoration in the saline
area of Yellow River basin[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 264.
(38) Kaseng, F., Lezama, P., Inquilla, R., y Rodriguez, C. (2020).
Evolution and
advance usage of Internet in Peru. 3C TIC. Cuadernos de desarrollo aplicados a
las TIC, 9(4), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2020.94.113-127
(39)
Che Xiangbei,Li Man,Zhang Xu,Alassafi Madini O. & Zhang Hongbin.(2021).
Communication architecture of power monitoring system based on incidence
matrix model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences(1). https://doi.org/
10.2478/AMNS.2021.1.00098.
10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any
commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of
interest.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2023.120151.186-205
205
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376
Ed. 51 Iss.12 N.1 January - March, 2023