1 INTRODUCTION
Here we examine the following problem for a p-biharmonic pseudo-parabolic equation with logarithmic
nonlinearity.
ut−∆ut+ ∆(|∆u|p−2∆u)−div(|∇u|q−2∇u)=−div(|∇u|q−2∇ulog |∇u|)if (x, t)∈Ω×(0,T),
u=∂u
∂ν =0 if (x, t)∈∂Ω×(0,T),
u(x, 0) = u0(x)if x∈Ω.
(1)
where Ω
⊂RN
(
N≥
1) represents a bounded domain whose boundary
∂
Ωis smooth enough,
T∈
(0
,∞
),
ν
indicates the normal vector on
∂
Ωpointing outward,
u0∈W2,p
0
(Ω)
\{
0
}
and the condition
2<p<q<p(1 + 2
N+2 )holds for pand q.
Pseudo-parabolic equations address several significant physical processes, like the evolution of two
components of intergalactic material, the leakage of homogeneous fluids through a rock surface, the
biomathematical modeling of a bacterial film, some thin film problems, the straight transmission
of nonlinear, dispersive, long waves, the heat transfer containing two temperatures, a grouping of
populations, etc. Shawalter and Ting [18], [22] first examined the pseudo parabolic equations in 1969.
After their precursory results, there are many papers studied the nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equations,
like semilinear pseudo-parabolic equations, quasilinear pseudo-parabolic equations, and even singular
and degenerate pseudo-parabolic equations (see [1], [28], [4], [6], [15], [24], [25]). A pseudo-parabolic
equation with p-Laplacian ∆
pu
=
div
(
|∇u|p−2∇u
)and logarithmic nonlinearity were studied by Nahn,
and Truong [13] in 2017. Considering the equation,
ut−∆ut−∆pu=|u|p−2ulog |u|
and by using the potential well method proposed by Sattinger [17] and a logarithmic Sobolev inequa-
lity, they proved the existence or nonexistence of global weak solutions. Additionally, they provided
requirements for both the large time decay of weak global solutions and the finite time blow-up of weak
solutions. Later, many authors [26], [27], [23] considered pseudo-parabolic equations with logarithmic
nonlinearity and established results for local and global existence, uniqueness, decay estimate and
asymptotic behaviour of solutions, blow-up results. Logarithmic nonlinearities in parabolic and pseudo-
parabolic equations were studied by Lakshmipriya et.al [11], [10] and other researchers [29], [9], [5] and
they proved the existence of weak solutions and their blow up in finite time. Lower bound of Blow-up
time to a fourth order parabolic equation modelling epitaxial thin film growth
Recently, higher-order equations have gained much importance in studies. Lower bound of Blow-up
time to a fourth order parabolic equation modelling epitaxial thin film growth studied by Liu et.al [3].
The p-biharmonic equation
ut+ ∆(|∆u|p−2∆u)+λ|u|p−2u=0
were studied by Liu and Guo [14], and by using the discrete-time method and uniform estimates, they
established the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions. Hao and Zhou [7] obtained results for blow
up, extinction and non-extinction of solutions for the equation
ut+ ∆(|∆u|p−2∆u)=|u|q−1
|Ω|Ω|u|dx.
Wang and Liu [8] studied the p-biharmonic parabolic equation with logarithmic nonlinearity,
ut+ ∆(|∆u|p−2∆u)=|u|q−1ulog |u|
for 2
<p<q<p
(1 +
4
n
)and proved the global existence, blow up, extinction and no extinction of
solutions. Then Liu and Li [2] studied,
ut+ ∆(|∆u|p−2∆u)=λ|u|q−1ulog |u|.
Based on the difference and variation methods, they showed the existence of weak solutions and observed
large-time behaviour and the transmission of solution perturbations for
λ>
0
,p > q > p
2
+1
,p > n
2
.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2022.112.108-122
Comert and Piskin [?] studied a p-biharmonic pseudo-parabolic equation with logarithmic nonlinearity
and used the potential well method and logarithmic Sobolev inequality obtained the existence of the
unique global weak solution. In addition, they also exhibited polynomial decay of solutions. Motivated
by these works, we have formulated our problem (1) for a p-biharmonic pseudo-parabolic equation
with logarithmic nonlinearity and studied their existence and non-existence. The problem (1) for the
case
p
=2is already investigated and proved the existence, uniqueness and blow up of solutions
(see [19], [20], [21]).
The rest of this paper is arranged to the two sections below. The preliminary notations, definitions,
and results we need to support our main findings are described in Section 2. Section 3 contains the
major findings of this paper explained in five theorems.
2 PRELIMINARIES
In this section, we provide some fundamental ideas and facts that are necessary for us to explain our
findings. In this article, we follow the notations listed below throughout.
∥.∥r
denotes the
Lr
(Ω) norm
for 1
≤r≤∞
,
∥.∥H1
0
denotes the norm in
H1
0
(Ω),(
., .
)
1
denotes the
H1
0
(Ω)-inner product.=,
r′
denotes
the Holder conjugate exponent of r>1(that is, r′=r
r−1).
We define the energy functional Jand the Nehari functional Ias follows:
I,J :W2,p
0(Ω) →Rby
J(u)=1
p∥∆u∥p
p+q+1
q2∥∇u∥q
q−1
qΩ|∇u|qlog |∇u|dx (2)
I(u)=∥∆u∥p
p+∥∇u∥q
q−Ω|∇u|qlog |∇u|dx (3)
Then we have,
J(u)=1
qI(u)+1
p−1
q∥∆u∥p
p+1
q2∥∇u∥q
q(4)
We introduce the Nehari manifold as
N={u∈W2,p
0(Ω)\{0}:I(u)=0}
also define the potential well as
W={u∈W2,p
0(Ω)\{0}:J(u)< d, I(u)>0}
where d= infu∈N J(u)is referred to as the depth of the potential well.
Definition 1. A function
u
=
u
(
x, t
)is considered to be a weak solution of problem (1) if
u∈
L∞(0,T;W2,p
0(Ω)),ut∈L2(0,T;H1
0(Ω)) and validates
(ut,ϕ)+(∇ut,∇ϕ)+(|∆u|p−2∆u, ∆ϕ)+(|∇u|q−2∇u, ∇ϕ)=(|∇u|q−2∇ulog |∇u|,∇ϕ)(5)
for all
ϕ∈W2,p
0
(Ω) and a.e 0
≤t≤T
along with
u
(
x,
0) =
u0
(
x
)in
W2,p
0
(Ω)
\{
0
}
. Furthermore, it also
agrees the energy inequality
t
0∥uτ∥2
H1
0dτ +J(u)≤J(u0),0<t≤T. (6)
Lemma 1. [12] Let ρbe a positive number. Then we have the following inequalities:
xplog x≤(eρ)−1for all x≥1
and
|xplog x|≤(ep)−1for all 0<x<1.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2022.112.108-122
3C TIC. Cuadernos de desarrollo aplicados a las TIC. ISSN: 2254-6529
Ed. 41 Vol. 11 N.º 2 August - December 2022
110